模范秘书

中国空军再赴埃及联训，远程体系作战“史诗级”加强？,情感二性V,原创 中国空军再赴埃及联训，远程体系作战“史诗级”加强？_我的网站

A |     很多人看中外联合军演，总喜欢盯着战机型号看热闹。    "Remember what happened in 1983? Two days after 241 Marines were blown up in Lebanon, the USA invaded tiny Grenada. Overnight, the previous headlines disappeared. I think we are seeing the same today. NATO is losing badly in Ukraine and it’s going to be a long winter for the West. Pounding its imperial chest with Taiwan is now what the MSM is reporting, much less so Ukraine," suggests Jeff J. Brown, author of "The China Trilogy," editor at China Rising Radio Sinoland, and curator of the Bioweapon Truth Commission.,If Pelosi travels to Taiwan, this would be the first time a high-ranking US politician visits the place in 25 years. Last time it was Newt Gingrich, then-speaker of the US House of Representatives, who arrived on the island in 1997, ignoring the Chinese leadership's discontent.,"I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period,'" Gingrich told the press at the time, as quoted by The New York Times. However, Clinton administration officials made it clear that Gingrich "was speaking for himself.",Likewise, it appears that Pelosi's apparent visit to Taiwan is not in line with the Biden administration's China policy, argues Francesco Sisci, a Beijing-based China expert, author, and columnist.,"American politics is not set like an omniscient Leviathan," the China expert says. "The Congress, the Senate, the executive all move according to different agendas which do not often coincide and are in conflict with one another. The issue is that there is a growing anti-Beijing sentiment in America and this has sometimes bursts which aren’t fully sorted out. I believe the visit is an expression of a sentiment, rather than of a clear cut plan.",According to CNN, Pelosi's initiative has triggered concerns both in the Biden administration and the Pentagon, with US national security officials "quietly working to convince House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of the risks of her potential trip to Taiwan." While in 1997 Beijing and Washington managed to solve the dilemma, this time the PRC leadership might opt for a harsher response, CNN and The Guardian have warned.,US Military Expansion in Asia-Pacific is Part of Plan to Take on Russo-China Tandem, Scholar Says28 July, 16:15 GMT,Washington has been fanning US-Sino tensions for quite a while, starting with Donald Trump's tariff war against Beijing, which has yet to be halted by Joe Biden. In a candid phone conversation, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned his American counterpart against "playing with fire" over Taiwan and explained that any involvement would ultimately backfire on the US.,"A Chinese general has publicly declared that Pelosi’s visit could entail a military response from Beijing," Brown says. "China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeated this. Now, with Xi’s 'You get burned playing with fire' metaphor, I think there would be a military response.",Senior Colonel Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Defense, stated on July 26: "If the US insists on taking its own course, the Chinese military will never sit idly by, and it will definitely take strong actions to thwart any external force's interference.",Tan highlighted that Pelosi's visit to Taiwan would "seriously violate the one-China principle" and "seriously harm China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and seriously damage the political foundation of China-US relations.",Meanwhile, Brown surmises that China's hypothetical response "might include a declared no-fly zone." However, there is a "much more elegant option," according to the author:,"[China could] take over Taiwan’s Kinmen Island, which is only two kilometers from Xiamen, off China’s Fujian Province coast. It would take only a few hours. I do not think Beijing will strike any US targets, unless attacked first.",North Korea Ready to Mobilize Nuclear Deterrence Forces at Any Moment - Kim Jong Un28 July, 01:13 GMT,The scholar also does not rule out that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) remark, made earlier this week, that Pyongyang is “fully prepared” for any military conflict with the United States is no coincidence.,"Does Biden know that China and nuclear-armed North Korea have had a mutual defense treaty since 1961?" Brown asks rhetorically. "NATO is being bled dry in Ukraine and it is imperial folly, hubris or geopolitical brinkmanship to think it can fight East Asia’s biggest and most powerful military, which is only 200 km from Taiwan.",For his part, Sisci believes that the PRC could opt for an asymmetrical non-military response. Still, the unfolding crisis is complicated by the fact that Washington is already involved in a confrontation with Russia, raising questions as to whether the US is capable of taking on Moscow and Beijing at once.,"I don’t think that either China or the US wants an escalation," says Sisci. "The talk between Biden and Xi Jinping was to avoid an escalation.",Brown also believes that Beijing's warnings have been heard by Washington.,"Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has been bandied about by Washington for months now," he says. "A supposed Covid-19 infection scuttled the first trial balloon. After Biden’s phone call yesterday with Xi, I suspect another American 'postponement' is likely to occur. If not, then 'Katy, bar the door!'"。但今年的中埃“文明之鹰”空军联训，真不是简单的换机型、走流程。

B |     对比去年的首次合作，今年的阵容和任务设计，藏着中国空军远程体系作战最关键的一次进阶，提升幅度完全称得上是跨越式升级。    去年我们第一次远赴非洲联训，整体风格偏向稳妥试水。出动的是歼-10C战机，演训科目也大多停留在战斗机互相对抗、混合编组、空中加油这类基础协同科目里。        这其实很好理解。第一次和埃及空军深度合作，分寸感必须拿捏到位。埃及空军的主力机型本就参差不齐，能用的只有米格-29，自家F-16电子和超视距战力被大幅阉割，新锐阵风战机又过于敏感，不方便大规模出动。    我们当时派出主打外贸、性能均衡的歼-10C，既是诚意展示，也是低调试水，完全是合理选择。但今年不一样，彻底告别了试水模式，直奔实战化体系练兵而去。    最直观的变化，就是主力战机全面更换。

C | 去年的歼-10C正式退场，取而代之的是6架歼-16重型战斗机，同时还新增了运-9LG电子战飞机，整套配置的含金量直接拉满。

D |         大家别觉得只是换了一架飞机、升级了一个机型，这里面的战力逻辑天差地别。

E | 歼-10C是中型战机，优势是灵活机动、性价比高，适合本土近海常态化部署、大规模列装执勤。    我们这次远赴埃及，全程六千多公里航程、近9小时不间断飞行，横跨两大洲、途经四个国家，考验的根本不只是战机的空战能力，而是远程奔袭综合实力。    如果继续用歼-10C搭配这套完整的远程作战体系，就是典型的“小马拉大车”。运-20运输机全套配齐，整套体系是为高强度、大载荷的远程作战量身打造的，中型战机根本撑不起这套配置的实战上限，只会造成整套体系战力的严重浪费。        歼-16就完全适配这套打法。航程更远、载弹量更大、多任务能力更强，既能承担远程制空对抗，也能执行对地对海打击，完美契合这次联训的核心目标。    而且去年我们已经用歼-10C完成了首轮海外环境测试、数据收集和协同磨合，该验证的基础问题都已经摸清了，今年换重型战机进阶练兵，本来就是循序渐进的必然选择。

F |     更关键的是，今年的演训任务，彻底跳出了“单机对抗”的浅层训练，真正聚焦体系作战核心。        今年的训练科目主打三大板块，空战战术对抗、全域制空攻防、全天候战斗搜救。能明显看出来，单纯的战机对抗只是辅助内容，更多训练重心，都放在了多机型协同、全流程体系联动上。    我们这次派出的阵容，本身就是一套完整成熟的海外作战闭环体系。预警指挥有空警500，战略投送有运-20，空中补给有运油-20，战场搜救有直-20，电子压制有专属的运-9LG电子战飞机，再加上歼-16作为核心打击主力。    从态势感知、电磁压制，到空中突击、后勤保障、战场救援，所有作战环节全部打通，这才是远程实战的核心底气。        很多人忽略了一个关键细节，这次六千多公里的跨洲转场，根本不是单纯的“赶路飞行”，全程都是演训任务的一部分。    去年歼-10C赴埃及联训，整个进驻过程花了整整三天。而今年歼-16编队，直接实现近9小时不间断跨境飞行，一次性完成快速部署。    这种差距，绝不是飞行员熟练度的问题，而是战机性能、编队协同、远程调度、体系保障能力的全方位碾压。

G |         战时状态下，兵力投送的速度，直接等同于战场主动权。

H | 数小时极速抵达，在瞬息万变的战场上，完全是两种作战结果。    这也是为什么我们宁愿舍弃低成本优势，也要用歼-16完成这次远程实战验证的核心原因。如果说歼-16是今年联训的“明面升级”，那运-9LG电子战飞机，就是本次演练真正的“王牌底牌”，甚至可以说它的战略价值远超歼-16。    很多人误以为它只是普通的电子侦察机，这是一款专注进攻性电子压制的特种战机，是现代空战里的“无形杀手”。        它搭载的平衡木相控阵天线，能够全方位扫描敌方各类电子设备，不管是地面防空雷达、空中预警系统，还是舰载雷达、通信指挥链路，都能实现精准锁定、多目标同步干扰压制。    简单来说，它能直接瘫痪对手的整个作战指挥、侦察、通信体系，让敌方雷达致盲、通信中断、指挥失灵，为我方歼-16等作战战机扫清所有电磁障碍。它的实战性能到底有多恐怖？        很多网友会纠结歼-10C和歼-16孰优孰劣，其实根本没必要。这两款战机从来不是替代关系，而是互补搭配的作战组合。    歼-10C胜在性价比高、部署灵活，适合本土常态化防空、日常战备执勤，是空军规模部署的基础力量。歼-16主打大航程，适配远程奔袭、海外联训、高强度对抗作战，是远程攻坚的核心主力。    我们这次远赴埃及升级联训阵容，本质上就是在复杂海外环境中，完整打磨一套成熟的跨洲际体系作战流程。从长航程转场、快速兵力部署，到境外电磁对抗、全域制空攻防、战场应急搜救，每一个环节都是实打实的实战化练兵。        以往我们的远程作战能力，更多停留在理论和模拟层面。而现在，通过一次次跨境联训，我们正在把千里之外的陌生空域、复杂气象、外军协同场景，变成常态化的练兵场。    这种体系化、实战化的远程作战能力稳步成型，才是这次中埃联训，最值得我们关注的真正突破。

I | 返回，查看更多。

Current article:http://fsbkyg.ningshunsaotuiqiao.shop/mf1/20260826/1523560.html

Published on:00:00:00